🔗 Share this article

The last time Vladimir Putin visited the South Asian nation four years ago, the international order looked entirely distinct. The brief visit, curtailed by the pandemic, focused on discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two nations.

Months later, the full-scale invasion of its neighbor would turn the Russian leader into a global pariah, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that era came before a significant shift in US-India relations, marked by inflammatory statements and the imposition of heavy import duties.

"Against this backdrop, the significance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM cannot be overstated, serving as a symbol of enduring ties and a defiance of outside coercion," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Two Major Powers

The summit takes place at a delicate moment. The Kremlin leader arrives after rejecting recent diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, bolstered by reported gains by Russian forces.

"From Moscow's perspective, the key significance of this engagement is its simple happening," commented a prominent analyst based in Moscow. "It suggests a movement toward something resembling routine global diplomacy."

For India, the stakes are even higher. The country navigates a difficult international environment, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a weakened Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

This delicate balance was highlighted just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats released a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a sharp response from Indian officials, who called it an inappropriate diplomatic practice.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The historical partnership originates from the Cold War era and remains firmly rooted, with Moscow long being Delhi's primary defense supplier. This alliance was generally accepted by the West until a recent shift.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's large-scale buying of discounted Russian oil. However, in the wake of failed peace efforts, pressure increased, leading to punitive tariffs and a major chill in US-India ties.

"In response, India has returned to its default strategy of 'hedging'," noted a strategic analyst. "This demonstrates to the US that it has alternatives and is waiting to see how the situation unfolds."

Beyond global diplomacy, India's core motivation with Russia is its strategic location. "China continues to be the primary security challenge to India, and for decades, India has relied on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst stated.

The deepening Moscow-Beijing axis has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to avoid an excessively close bond between its northern neighbor and its traditional ally.

This apprehension has also accelerated India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, decreasing its reliance on Russian equipment from about 70% to a reduced portion in recent years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: purchase enough Russian weaponry to maintain the alliance, but not become overly reliant that a supply disruption would leave it vulnerable," the analyst remarked.

The Oil Question

Enhanced economic cooperation is expected to be a key agenda item. President Putin has recently emphasized plans to take cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", in spite of Western sanctions.

The matter of crude oil purchases is pivotal. Although the Indian government has stated to keep buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have slowed activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has agreed to boost imports of US energy.

A Russian official acknowledged "obstacles" in economic cooperation but insisted it would proceed uninterrupted. The official downplayed the impact of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "minor" and "brief" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "means" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

When the two leaders sit down, the issue of Ukraine is expected to be mentioned primarily through India's consistent appeal for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader can speak to all parties, the nation lacks the necessary leverage to alter the course of the war," the analyst noted. "Beyond urging negotiations, its ability to make a difference is constrained."

Ultimately, despite the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the partnership is fundamentally one of "pragmatic strategic interest," guided by national interest in a rapidly changing world.